[2026:RJ-JP:7868] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 2754/2026 1. Mubarik S/o Suleman, R/o Islamabadi Mohalla Utawad, Police Station Utawad, District Palwal, State Haryana. (Currently In District Jail Deeg). 2. Saddam S/o Idu, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Madhak Mohalla, Utawad, Police Station Utawad, District Palwal, State Haryana. (Currently In District Jail Deeg). 3. Javid S/o Kurseed, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Islamabadi Mohalla, Utawad, Police Station Utawad, District Palwal, State Haryana. (Currently In District Jail Deeg). 4. Tahir S/o Roshan, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Adbar, Police Station City Nuh, District Nuh Mewat, State Haryana. (Currently In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 2753/2026 1. Jalauddin @ Handu S/o Jaan Mohammad, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kureshi Mohalla Lihanga Kalan Police Station Punhana District Nuh Mewat State Harayana. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) 2. Sohail S/o Salla, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Kasai Mohalla Kasba Nagar, Police Station Nagar District Deeg (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/02/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:7868] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2754/2026] 1. These second bail applications have been filed by the accused petitioners u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 316/2025 registered at Police Station Nagar, District Deeg for offence u/S 109(1) & 324(4) of BNS and Section 3 of PDPP Act and Section 5 & 8 of Rajasthan Bovine Act and Section 11(1)(D) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioners submits that the accused petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and after completion of investigation, the police has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and the accused petitioners are in custody for more than two months. He further submits that the trial will take its own time, therefore the accused petitioners may be released on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners and so also the allegations against the accused petitioners and further the fact that the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused petitioners are in custody for more than 2 months, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these second bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that [2026:RJ-JP:7868] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2754/2026] they shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /4-5