Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6201 (PAT)

Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Ashish Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./6275/2026 · 2026-02-26

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6275 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025 Thana- CHANDAN District- Banka ====================================================== Dhaneshwar Yadav @ Ashish Yadav Son of Dabru Yadav @ Debu yadav @ Dharu yadav Resident of Village -Donia PS -Chandan Dist- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashish Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act. 3. As per FIR, one country made pistol has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner which he had concealed in his clothes. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that a false recovery of one country made pistol has been shown from the possession of the petitioner, however, there is no independent witness to the search and seizure thereby violating the mandatory provisions thereof. Further, the petitioner is a young boy aged about 23 years and is in custody since 13.04.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6275 of 2026(3) dt.26-02-2026 2/2 application for bail on the ground that the petitioner has one more antecedent of similar nature. In response, it has been submitted that the said case is also connected to the present case and the petitioner is on bail in the said case. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that the petitioner has remained in custody for about nine months and charge-sheet has been submitted, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandan P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, subject to the conditions that: (I) One of the bailors will be a family member/close relative. (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date till conclusion of trial and if the petitioner does not appear on two consecutive dates without any substantial and satisfactory reason, the learned court below would be at liberty to cancel his bail bonds. devendra/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T