Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6200 (RAJ)

MOHIT @ MONU PEHELWAN S/O SITARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2619/2026 · 2026-03-05

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9404] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2619/2026 Mohit @ Monu Pehelwan S/o Sitaram, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Bhuda, Police Station Raini, District Alwar, Present R/o Alwar Kati Ghati Police Station Aravali Vihar District Alwar Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Alwar). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sogarwal with Mr. Hitesh Haritwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Vinod Sharma Mr. Sapan Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 05/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 13/2026 registered at Police Station Alwar District Partapgarh for the offence(s) under Sections 3, 25(6) of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant has submitted that the applicant is behind the bars since 21.01.2026. It is further submitted that the case registered against the applicant under Section 3 and 25(6) of Arms Act. It is further submitted that the main accused, Siyaram Meena, upon whom the allegation of use of weapon has been attributed, has already been enlarged on bail by the learned court below. It is further submitted that false and fictitious complaint on account of incident but fulfill the investigation in a short time. [2026:RJ-JP:9404] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2619/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the applicant is behind the bars since 21.01.2026; that main accused, Siyaram Meena, upon whom the allegation of use of weapon has been attributed, has already been enlarged on bail by the learned court below and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mohit @ Monu Pehelwan S/o Sitaram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. 6. Considering the strong criminal antecedents registered against the accused-applicant, this court deems it fit to direct the accused- applicant shall contribute to the Swach Bharat Abhiyan – initiative of the government, for a period of one month, on two hours per day basis, as an honorary work, under the supervision and directions of the SHO qua the FIR (Supra) in consonance with the directions of the Municipal Corporation/Local Administrative authorities concerned. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/44