Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16607 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07.08.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP(MD). No. 16607 of 2026 M.Senthil Kumar ...Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tallakulam, Madurai District. (Crime No.20 of 2026) ...Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.G.B.Kaverimani Advocate For Respondent : Mr.N.Balasubramanian Counsel for State of TN (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in Cr.No. 20 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police. ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 19.06.2026, for the offences punishable under Sections 74 and 75 of BNS, in Crime No.20 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16607 of 2026 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is the father of the victim, who is aged about 20 years. The petitioner attempted to commit rape upon the victim, when she was alone in the home. He also tried to molest her several time. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that the allegation is only the petitioner attempted to commit rape and outraged the modesty is a false accusations. Due to matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and his wife, this present complaint was lodged. He is in custody from 19.06.2026 and ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Counsel for the State of TN (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and relying upon the Statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183(5) of BNSS, stated that the victim girl has clearly stated about the petitioner's act of sexual assault made on her. Investigation in this case is still pending. The petitioner was 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16607 of 2026 arrested only recently. However, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. I have also gone through the Statement of the victim girl recorded under Section 183(5) of BNSS, though it reveals certain facts regarding the manner in which the complaint has been lodged, it is not the case of aggravated penetrative sexual assault and it is the case of attempted to commit rape and also considering the period of incarceration, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. [a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall stay at Thanjavur, report before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thanjavur, 10.30 a.m., on all working days, for a period of six weeks, thereafter as and when required for interrogation; 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16607 of 2026 [c] the petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he/she is accused, or suspected, or of the commission of which he/she is suspected; [d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 51730]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS. (K R S J) 07.08.2026 TM 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16607 of 2026 To 1. The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai. 2. The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thanjavur. 3.The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tallakulam, Madurai District. (Crime No.20 of 2026) 4.The Superintendent, District Prison, Madurai. 5.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.(MD)No.16607 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. TM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No. 16607 of 2026 Date : 07.08.2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis