Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 61929 (MAD)

Mathiyalagan v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Inspector Of Police, Thiruvidaimarudhur

CRL OP(MD)/18229/2026 · 2026-08-21

K Murali Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21.08.2026 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 1.Mathiyalagan 2.Mariyappan ... Petitioners/ Accused 6&5 Vs The State of Tamilnadu rep by The Inspector of Police, Station House Officer, Thiruvidaimaruthur Police Station, Thanjavur District. (Crime No.771 of 2026) ... Respondent/ Complainant For Petitioners: M/s.P.Vimala, Advocate For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of TN(Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.771 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners / accused 6 and 5, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.08.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 120B, 420, 447, 465, 466, 468 and 471 IPC, in Crime No.771 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners along with other accused had created forged revenue records and by using the same, the first accused executed a settlement deed in favour of his son, the second accused, who in turn, executed a fraudulent deed transferring the property in favour of the fourth accused's husband. Hence, the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they have been falsely implicated in the above case and that they are no way connected with the alleged crime. He would further submit that the 2/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 fourth accused was granted bail by this Court in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17951 of 2026 on 19.08.2026 as she was neither a party nor a witness to the alleged sale deed and that the petitioners are in judicial custody from 03.08.2026. 4. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police would submit that the allegation levelled against the petitioners is that they encroached the disputed land and that the petitioners were neither parties nor witnesses to the alleged sale deed. He would further submit that the second petitioner is having two previous cases. 5. Considering the above facts and circumstances and the nature of the offences alleged against the petitioners and also the facts that the petitioners were neither parties nor witnesses to the alleged sale deed and that the first petitioner is not having any previous cases and the second petitioner is not having any previous cases for similar offence, this 3/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions: 6. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur and on further conditions that: (i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate / concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; (ii)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; (iii)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioners shall not abscond during trial; 4/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 (v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate / Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners are released on bail by the learned Magistrate / Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; (vi)If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS, 2023. (K M S J) 21.08.2026 CSM TO 1. The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvidaimaruthur. 2. The Superintendent, District Prison, Pudukkottai. 3. The Inspector of Police, Station House Officer, Thiruvidaimaruthur Police Station, Thanjavur District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 CRL OP(MD). No.18229 of 2026 K.MURALI SHANKAR,J CSM ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.18229 of 2026 Date : 21.08.2026 6/6