SUNITA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
CRWP/3639/2026 · 2026-03-30
Aaradhna Sawhney
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6192 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6192 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-3639-2026
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 200
CRWP-3639-2026
Date of decision: 30.03.2026
Sunita Devi and another
...Petitioners
Versus State of Haryana and others
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE AARADHNA SAWHNEY
Present : Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners.
***** AARADHNA SAWHNEY, J.(ORAL)
Apprehending threat to their life and liberty, both the petitioners have filed the present petition with a prayer to direct the official respondents to decide the representation dated 30.03.2026 (Annexure P-5).
!
"#
#$
%
&
#
2.
Notice of motion.
3.
Mr. Vishal Singh, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents and has no objection to the prayer made by the petitioners.
4.
In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 30.03.2026 (Annexure P-5) within a HAMANT 2026.03.31 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRWP-3639-2026
2
period of two weeks. In case, it is found that there is a genuine threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners, then necessary steps warranted under law be taken at the earliest, so as to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
5.
It is, however, clarified that this order shall not be taken to be any expression as regards the alleged marriage of the petitioners and shall not confer any immunity upon the petitioners, in case it is found that they have committed any wrong.
(AARADHNA SAWHNEY)
JUDGE
30.03.2026 Hemant
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable
: Yes / No HAMANT 2026.03.31 16:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document