Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6192 (JHR)

SAHEB SINGH ALIAS SABI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3067/2026 · 2026-04-16

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:11012] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3067 of 2026 ------ 1. Saheb Singh @ Sabi, aged about 45 years, son of Lakhendra Singh, resident of Village Mukrampur, P.O. Piplaiya Gopal, P.S. Bilaspur, District Rampur (Uttar Pradesh) 2. Gurunam Singh @ Sodhi, aged about 38 years, son of Satnam Singh, resident Village Loka, P.O. and P.S. Sattarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar (Uttarakhand) .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sahil, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-16-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have been made accused in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b)(ii)(B)/ 21(b)/ 22(b)/ 29 of the NDPS Act, 1985. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners indulged in illegal sale and purchase of brown sugar and Ganja and from the co-accused Adtiya Yadav @ Sameer, 16.48 gm of brown sugar was recovered and from the petitioners, 1.960 Kg Ganja was recovered, which was kept in their vehicle. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that the seized Ganja comes under intermediate quantity. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as is evident from para-16 of the instant bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 17.02.2026 as is evident from para-15 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertake not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioners. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioners is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Hazaribagh in connection with Lohsinghna P.S. Case No. 11 of 2026 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 16.04.2026 Vedanti/