Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 61909 (MAD)

The State of Tamil Nadu v. The Correspondent and Headmistress

CMP(MD)/10984/2026 · 2026-08-13

C V Karthikeyan, R Sakthivel

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP(MD)No.10984 of 2026 in WA(MD)SR.No.63900 of 2026 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 61 days in filing the Writ Appeal. 2. In the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it is stated that owing to administrative reasons the delay had occurred. 3.Notice had been directed and notice was served. The learned counsel entered appearance for the respondents. 4.Taking the above stated facts into consideration, the delay stands condoned and this petition is allowed. The Registry is directed to number the appeal if it is otherwise in order. When the matter is listed for admission, the name of the learned counsel, who appeared for the respondents, shall be printed in the cause list. (C.V.K.,J) & (R.S.V.,J) bala 13.08.2026 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J. and R. SAKTHIVEL, J. bala CMP(MD)No.10984 of 2026 in WA(MD)SR.No.63900 of 2026 13.08.2026 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis