1 APHC010220972022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1567/2022 Between: 1. TARRA VENKATARAMANA, S/O. LATE APPA RAO, AGED 42 YEARS, OCC. SEVAKA IN SRIPADA SRI VLLABHA MAHA SAMATHANAM, PITAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, R/ O. 8- 1/34, PAPPAPA VEEDHI, PITAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. BHAMIDIPATI VENKATA SANTHOSA LAKSHMI, W/O. BH.S.N. DATTU, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC. COMPUTER OPERATOR IN SRIPADA SRI VLLABHA MAHA SAMATHANAM, PITAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, R/O. 12-2-17, BARUVARI STREET, NEAR MADHAVA SWAMY TEMPLE, PITAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. HARI JAWAHAR LAL I A S, COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. R SOWJANYA, W/O. PRABHAKAR, EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SRIPADA SRI VALLABHA MAHA SAMASTHANAM, PITAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of The 2 Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful violation and disobeying the orders of this Hon'ble Court in W.P. No.45966 of 2018 dated 18-12-2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. D V SASIDHAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience in implementation of the order passed by this Court on 18.12.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.45966 of 2018. 2. This Court, in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.45966 of 2018 passed the following order on 18.12.2018: “Pending further orders, the 2nd respondent shall consider petitioners’ representation dt: 20.08.2018 within four (4) weeks and communicate his decision to the petitioners.” 3. Heard learned counsel on either side. 4. Today when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the contemnors has furnished a copy of proceedings bearing Rc.No.A2/11024(43)/49/2022, dated 25.07.2022 of the 1st respondent/contemnor by way of which, the representation submitted by the petitioners was considered and rejected. 5. As the orders passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.45966 of 2018 are complied with, the contempt case is closed. However, as W.P.No.45966 of 2018 is still pending adjudication before this Court, the petitioners are at liberty to pursue the said writ petition. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 17.07.2026 Gss