CRWP-387 IN 174 BABITA R STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA CRM-W- 1. CRWP-387 1. Constitutio official resp at the han representati 2. submitted 30.03.2026 (Annexure but the sam thereon. H 3876-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG ITA RANI AND ANOTHER Versus TE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Mr. Abhinandan Sekhri, Advo Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) -508-2026 The application is allowed as p 3876-2026 The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the e hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 30.03.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Senior Superinten exure P-3) raising their grievances as he same has not yet been considere on. He further submitted that at this F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-3876-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 ...Petitione ersus ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA Advocate for the petitioners , Sr. DAG, Punjab as prayed for. s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 7 and to take action on the nexure P-3). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o erintendent of Police, District Bata ces as mentioned in the present petitio sidered and no action has been take at this stage, the petitioners would b .2026 titioners ondents of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on Batala petition n taken ould be AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-376 satisfied if Superintend representati 3. 4. on behalf o in due cour the course o 5. commentin disposed of aforesaid re within a p accordance petitioners, order to pr 06.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whe 3766-2026 -2- fied if appropriate directions are iss rintendent of Police, District Ba sentation filed by the petitioners and ta Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ehalf of the respondents-State and sub e course. Let a complete set of the pap ourse of the day. In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction said representation dated 30.03.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, rdance with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye re issued to respondent No.2- Senio Batala to decide the aforesa and take necessary action thereon. , Sr. DAG, Punjab, has advance notic d submits that the needful will be don the paperbook be supplied to her durin rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No.2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Senior foresaid e notice be done during without tition is cide the titioners order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.