Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6188 (RAJ)

DAMODAR KMAR AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR

CRLMP/815/2015 · 2026-03-13

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10631] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 815/2015 1.Damodar Kumar son of Deenanath Agarwal, aged about 65 years, resident of Gandhi Path, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. 2. Suresh Jain son of Shri Fateh Chand Jain, aged about 58 years, resident of 108, Hari Marg, Civil Lines, Jaipur. 3. Gautam Jain son of Shri Suresh Jain, aged about 29 years, resident of 108, Hari Marg, Civil Lines, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan through P.P. 2. Madhusudan Kumar Bhatnagar son of N.P. Bhatnagar, resident of A-38, Tilak Nagar, Flat No.203, Emerald Akshita, Vidhyalaya Marg, Police Station Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Narendra Singh Dhakar, PP Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 13/03/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a challenge has been led to FIR No.62/2015 registered with Police Station Manak Chowk, District Jaipur (North) for the offences under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC. 2. At the outset, it has been apprised at Bar that after investigation in the instant FIR, the police has submitted final report negative, hence, under these circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with this petition and the same has become infructuous. [2026:RJ-JP:10631] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-815/2015] 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 4. The stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/13