Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6186 (JHR)

DR SUJIT KUMAR PARIRA v. STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LTD THROUGH ITS CGM

WPC/5774/2024 · 2026-04-13

Sri Ananda Sen

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10517 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5774 of 2024 Dr. Sujit Kumar Parira, S/o Sushila Kumar Parira, R/o Sec. 04/C, Qr. No.1069, Bokaro Steel City, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Steel City, Dist Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Petitioner(s). Versus 1.Steel Authority of India Limited through its CGM, Town Administration, Land and Estate, Sail, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Sector 4, Bokaro 2.The General Manager, Town Administration, SAIL, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Sector 4, Dist Bokaro 3.The Assistant General manager, Town Administration, SAIL, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Sector 4, Dist Bokaro 4.The General Manager, Projects, SAIL, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Sector 4, Dist Bokaro 5.The Estate Officer, SAIL, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Sector 4, Dist Bokaro 6.The Authorised Officer appointed for Eviction of the Public Premises, SAIL, Bokaro, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro Sector 4, Dist Bokaro … Respondent(s). …… CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Ms. Arushi Agrawal, Advocate …...... 06/ 13.04.2026: I.A. No.3958 of 2026 This interlocutory application has been filed to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is an alternative remedy available to the petitioner, thus, he wants to withdraw this writ petition to avail the alternative remedy. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant interlocutory application is allowed. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 6. Pending I.As., if any, stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 13rd April, 2026 R.S./S.K.D. Uploaded on 16/04/2026