[2026:RJ-JP:14104] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5192/2026 Arun Sharma S/o Brijesh Kumar Sharma, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Ward No. 45, 38 Nehru Path Krishn Nagar 2 Lal Kothi, P.S. Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. (Currently In Judicial Custody At Sub Jail Sambhar Lake, Jaipur). ----Accused Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshay Sharma Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 06/04/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 123/2025 registered at Police Station Mokhampura, District Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Section(s) 324(5), 329(3), 61(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is behind the bars since 26.02.2026. He also submits that co-accused namely Ranveer Sharma has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 27.03.2026 in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4279/2026. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. He also submits that issue involved between [2026:RJ-JP:14104] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5192/2026] the petitioner and the complainant has been resolved by executing the compromise deed and conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused- petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the accused- petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused- petitioner hereinabove and submits that there are criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner is behind the bars since 26.02.2026; co-accused has already been enlarged on bail; the alleged offences is triable by Magistrate; issue involved between the petitioner and the complainant has been resolved by executing the compromise deed and trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Arun Sharma S/o Brijesh Kumar Sharma is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is [2026:RJ-JP:14104] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5192/2026] transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1st and 15th day of every month in the concerned police station. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. 9. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J KAVISH /64