Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6180 (GAU)

ANJU DEKA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 OTHERS

WP(C)/2657/2025 · 2026-05-14

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010100172025 2026:GAU-AS:6783 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2657/2025 ANJU DEKA D/O- LATE PRAFULLA DEKA, VILL- JAHA, P.O- PUB BALAKUCHI, MUKALMUA, DIST- NALBARI, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 OTHERS REP BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, HOME AND POLITICAL DEPARTMENT, GUWAHATI, ASSAM 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER NALBARI ASSAM PIN-781335 3:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (BUILDING DIVISION) NALBARI ASSAM PIN-781335 4:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BARKHETRI REVENUE CIRCLE NALBARI ASSAM PIN-78131 Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. S Hoque Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the respondent(s):Mr. B Gogoi, Addl. AG, Assam & Standing Counsel, PWD B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH ORDER 15.05.2026 Heard Mr. S Hoque, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. I have also heard Mr. B Gogoi, the learned Addl. AG, Assam who appears on behalf of the PWD being the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming an amount of Rs.58,21,553/- from the respondent authorities on the ground that the petitioner has completed various works and was, therefore, entitled to the said amount. 3. This Court has perused the entire writ petition and there is not a single document issued by the PWD authorities whereby the petitioner has been shown to have been issued any work order. There is also nothing on record that the PWD authorities or the other respondent authorities have acknowledged that the petitioner had carried out any work. 4. On these materials alone, it is the opinion of this Court that no writ can be issued. 5. Accordingly, this Court does not find any merit in the instant writ petition, for which, the writ petition stands dismissed. 6. Before proceeding with the records, this Court observes that the dismissal of Page No.# 3/3 the writ petition shall not preclude or prejudice the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum, if so permissible under the law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant