Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6180 (ALL)

RANJEET SHARMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

CRLP/13866/2026 · 2026-09-07

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing, Tarun Saxena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13866 of 2026 Court No. - 48 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following main reliefs:- "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned First Information Report dated 22.04.2026 in Case Crime No.158 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 352, 351 (3) of BNS at Police Station Premnagar, District Jhansi (Annexure no.1). ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing respondent no.2 not to arrest of the petitioner in pursuance of the First Information Report dated 22.04.2026 in Case Crime No.158 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 352, 351 (3) of BNS at Police Station Premnagar, District Jhansi." 2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State submitted that after completion of investigation charge-sheet has already been forwarded on 21.07.2026 to the Court concerned. He has placed the short counter affidavit during the course of arguments, which is taken on record. He has relied upon the paragraph no.5 of the short counter affidavit. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submitted and prayed that in the light of the statement given by learned AGA for the State as well as the contents made in paragraph no.5 of the short counter affidavit the instant writ petition may be disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Piyush Kumar Shukla Ranjeet Sharma .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, Mr. Piyush Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3, Mr. S.K. Ojha, learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and perused the material available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by the learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of the State and contents made in paragraph no.5 of the short counter affidavit as well as prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, we do not find any reason to keep this matter pending for further adjudication. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed. September 8, 2026 Atul CRLP No. 13866 of 2026 2 (Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad