Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:10397] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2821/2026 Chandan S/o Motiram, R/o Deh, Police Station Surpaliya, District Nagaur, At Present Resident Of Chand Baasni Deedwana, Police Station Deedwana, District Deedwana-Kuchaman (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravindra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Narsi Prasad Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 12/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.218/2025 registered at Police Station Kishangarh, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner submits that the primary issue in this case revolves around the agreement executed between the co-accused, Arjun, and the complainant- Shahid Mohammed. The role of the present petitioner was solely as an attesting witness to the agreement. There are no cogent
[2026:RJ-JP:10397] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2821/2026] circumstances which shows the active contribution of the petitioner in the case. The petitioner is behind the bars since 29.01.2026 and has one previous criminal antecedent of a different nature. The case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, accordingly, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Chandan S/o Motiram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/18