ca9392.26 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 51 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9392 OF 2026 IN SAST/6649/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2845 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12422 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2846 OF 2025 Tulsiram Manik Waghmare VERSUS Sayyed Chandsaab Sayyed Mehboob Died Through Lrs And Another ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Sachin G. Joshi Advocate for Respondent No.2 : Ms. Priyanka Sarnaik h/f Mr. Uddhav L. Momale ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATED : 31st AUGUST, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. The civil application No. 9392 of 2026 is filed for adding the subsequent purchaser of the suit property in the second appeal. Perused the application. Heard learned advocates of both sides. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Amendment be carried out within two weeks from today. After the amendment is carried, issue notice to the proposed respondent No.3, returnable on 12.10.2026. 2. The civil application No. 2845 of 2025 is filed for 2026:BHC-AUG:39749 ca9392.26 -2- condonation of delay of 100 days caused in filing the second appeal. Perused the application. Heard learned advocates for both sides. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and disposed of. 3. In so far as civil application No. 2846 of 2025 is concerned, no any decree is passed against the applicant. The application therefore, is not maintainable and is disposed of accordingly. 4. The civil application No. 12422 of 2025 is filed for grant of temporary injunction by way of prayer clause “B” which reads as under:- “B. That, the respondent No.2 or his agent/ servant/representative or any GPA holder may kindly be injuncted by way of appropriate order from alienation of the suit property i.e. agriculture land of Sy. No.14/2 admeasuring 6 Acre 25 Gunthas situated at village Haibatpur, Tq. Udgir, District Latur.” 5. Now the suit property, involved in the matter, is transferred to the proposed respondent No.3. The application therefore, becomes infructuous and it is disposed of. 6. In second appeal, issue notice to the respondents, ca9392.26 -3- returnable on 12.10.2026. 7. Ms. Sarnaik, learned advocate h/f Mr. Momale, learned advocate, waives notice for respondent No. 2. Respondent Nos. 1-A and 1-B are already served by way of paper publication. Therefore, it is not necessary to issue notices to them. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/