APHC010309182026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3327] WEDNESDAY, THE 15th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 16051/2026 Between: 1. KILARI RAMANAMMA,, W/O LATE GOVINDA RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE COOLIE, R/O DOOR NO.2-63, PEDDA JONNAVALASA VILLAGE, TJONNAVALASA PANCHAYAT, AMADALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, ZILLA PARISHAD COMPOUND, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532001. 3. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DIVISION, MANDAL PARISHAD OFFICE COMPLEX, AMADALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532185. 4. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, AMADALAVALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT - 532185. 5. T JONNAVALASA GRAMPANCHAYAT, AMADALAVALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. YADLA SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O.LATE RAMULU, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. CONTRACTOR, R/O PEDDA JONNAVALASA VILLAGE, T.JONNAVALASA PANCHAYAT, AMADALAVALASA SRK,J W.P No.16051 of 2026 2 MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toTo issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the respondents particularly respondent Nos.3 to 6 in entering into the house site of the petitioner in L.P.No.486 (old Sy.No.25) of Pedda Jonnavalasa village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District on 15.06.2026 by taking measurements to lay a CC road across the said house site from west to east without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority of law or jurisdiction and in clear violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to lay a road in the house site and not to dispossess her from the house site an extent of Ac.0.0125 cents in L.P.No.486 (Old Sy.No.25) of Pedda Jonnavalasa village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to neither lay a CC road nor dispossess the petitioner from her house site in an extent of 18.5 Sq.Yds in L.P.No.486 (Old Sy.No.25) of Pedda Jonnavalasa village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV SRK,J W.P No.16051 of 2026 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY Writ Petition No:16051 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief: “...to issue an order, direction or writ, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the high handed action of the respondents particularly respondent Nos.3 to 6 in in trying to lay a C.C.Road across the house site of the petitioner in L.P.No.486 (old Sy.No.25) of Pedda Jonnavalasa village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District from west to east without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary, without any authority of law or jurisdiction and in clear violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also violation of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to lay a road in the house site and not to dispossess her from the house site an extent of Ac.0.0125 cents in L.P.No.486 (Old Sy.No.25) of Pedda Jonnavalasa village, Amadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District and pass such other order or orders…” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY Date:15.07.2026 Ksj