A. Vincent Raj v. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Superintendent of Police
WP Crl.(MD)/4453/2026 · 2026-08-07
L Victoria Gowri
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 61764 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 61764 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4453 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2026
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4453 of 2026 A.Vincent Raj ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruchendur Taluk Police Station, Thiruchendur, Thuticoin District.
3. Sarina Kagu
4. Judu
... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take necessary action as against the private respondents by considering the petitioner's complaints dated 27.07.2026 and 30.07.2026 and to conclude the same within time frame as fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.D.S.Haroon Rasheed For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy (R1 & R2) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4453 of 2026
ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 2nd respondent to take necessary action as against the private respondents by considering the petitioner's complaints dated 27.07.2026 and 30.07.2026 and to conclude the same within time frame as fixed by this Court.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has lodged a complaint as against the private respondents herein, who have broke opened the petitioner's shop illegally and looted the construction materials. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed.
3. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the enquiry is pending.
4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's complaints dated 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4453 of 2026 27.07.2026 and 30.07.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 07.08.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm TO:-
1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Tuticorin District.
2. The Inspector of Police, Thiruchendur Taluk Police Station, Thiruchendur, Thuticoin District.
3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4453 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm
Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4453 of 2026 Dated 07.08.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis