DILIP KUMAR VERMA S/O MOOLCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1906/2026 · 2026-04-15
Ganesh Ram Meena
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6174 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6174 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:15606] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1906/2026 Dilip Kumar Verma S/o Moolchand, Aged About 35 Years, R/o New Colony, Thanagaji Police Station Thanagaji, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Gopalpura Sub Jail, Kotputli Behror) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deshraj Sain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sriram Dhaka, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 15/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 405/2025 registered at Police Station Pragpura, District Kotputli-Behror for offence under Sections 8, 21, 22 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985 against the order dated 20.01.2026 whereby learned Trial Court dismissed the bail application filed by the accused-petitioner for the offences punishable under Section 8/29. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he provided the alleged contraband to the co-accused namely Rinku Yadav from whose possession it was recovered. Police after
[2026:RJ-JP:15606] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1906/2026] completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and he is in custody since 22.12.2025. 5. The accused-petitioner has been made an accused on the basis of the statements of the co-accused with the aid of Section 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8.
8. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this bail order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /37