CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11/08/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 Amen Kumar, S/o. Kailash Mandal, Mahama Post, Beltikari Village, Godda District, Jharkhand State.. ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State of Tamilnadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Rameswaram Town Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District. In Crime No.185 of 2026.. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Neelamegam K, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.T.Lenin Kumar, Counsel for State of TN (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- C-32B. For Bail in Crime No. 185 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent Police. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Sole Accused, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act, 1985, in Crime No.185 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that on 12.07.2026, at about 06.00 a.m., the petitioner tried to escape from the place, when he saw the respondent Police. The respondent Police caused the petitioner and found that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 2 kgs of Ganja. Hence, the complaint has been registered. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. He would further submitted that the petitioner is incarceration from 12.07.2026 and the quantity involved in this case is a intermediate quantity and Section 37 of 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 the NDPS Act is not applicable to this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is working in catering as a temporary railway employee. Hence, he prayed for grant of bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Counsel for State of TN (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and reported that the petitioner illegally trafficked 2 kgs of Ganja. He further submitted that the petitioner has no previous cases. The investigation in this case is still pending. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the quantity recovered is a intermediate quantity that Section 37 of the NDPS Act is not applicable to this case and that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 12.07.2026, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner subject to the following conditions: 6.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 sureties (One surety shall be a relative of the petitioner and the other shall be a local surety) each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameshwaram, and on further conditions that; (i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity; (ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; (iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial; (v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 (vi)If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 BNS, 2023. (K M S J) 11.08.2026 VSG TO 1.The learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Rameshwaram. 2. The Superintendent, District Prison, Ramanathapuram. 3.The Inspector of Police, Rameswaram Town Police Station, Rameswaram, Ramanathapuram District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP(MD). No.16921 of 2026 K.MURALI SHANKAR,J., vsg ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.16921 of 2026 Date : 11/08/2026 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis