Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6173 (GAU)

STATE OF ASSAM v. LABO ROY

Crl.L.P./18/2026 · 2026-05-19

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010090782026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) I.A.(Crl.)/519/2026 STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ASSAM VERSUS LABO ROY S/O LATE RAMANI KANTA ROY VILL- POKALAGI PT. V P.S- GOLAKGANJ DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR K.K. DAS (ADDL. PP ASSAM) Advocate for : appearing for LABO ROY Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K.K. DAS (ADDL. PP, ASSAM), Advocate for the Respondent : , Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 THE STATE OF ASSAM PP ASSAM GAUHATI HIGH COURT OLD BUILDING Page No.# 2/2 VERSUS LABO ROY R/O POKALAGI PT 4 PS GOLAKGANJ DIST DHUBRI ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR KANGKAN KUMAR DAS Advocate for : appearing for LABO ROY Ca Linked se : BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 20.05.2026 Heard Mr. M P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam representing the applicant. This is an application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 262 days in preferring the connected appeal. The delay has been satisfactorily explained. Going for issuing notice would be nothing but sheer waste of time. Therefore, the delay has been condoned. The connected appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The interlocutory application is disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant