Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6172 (RAJ)

ASHOK GURJAR S/O RADHESHYAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4123/2026 · 2026-03-28

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13177] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4123/2026 Ashok Gurjar S/o Radheshyam, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Kankara, Police Station Kishangarhbas, District Khairthal-Tijara. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas) ---Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 67/2026 registered at Police Station Kishangarhbas District Khairthal-Tijara for the offence(s) under Sections 3 & 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 and Sections 318(4), 287, 125 & 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the matter pertains to the Essential Commodities Act, and applicant is alleged of storing in larger quantity, commodity-unlisted without any valid permit. It is submitted that the applicant is behind bars from one and a half month. It is further submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, and having a single antecedent registered against him, pertaining to the year 2018 under distinguishable statute. [2026:RJ-JP:13177] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4123/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the present bail application. 4. Having heard the contentions made by the counsel representing both the parties, upon a perusal of the material available on record and taking note of the fact that the applicant is behind bars from one and a half month; that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that the criminal antecedent registered against the applicant is of distinguishable nature, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Ashok Gurjar S/o Radheshyam shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /38