WP No. 9347 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 17-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 9347 of 2026 R. Navaprakash ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Collector O/o. Chennai Collectorate, Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, chennai 01 2. the Revenue Divisional officer O/o. RDO North chennai, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai 66 3. The Tahsildar O/o. Madhavaram Taluk office, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai 66 ..Respondent(s) to rectify and correct the extent in the sub divided survey No. 83/3E1A (formerly S.No. 83/3E1) as per Patta No. 466 of Mathur village, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai district which pertains to the petitioner schedule of property purchased vide sale deed dated 5.09.2022 registered as Document No. 7764 of 2022 , Book 1, S.R.O. Thiruvottiyur based on the petitioners representation dated 20.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.V.Naveen Kumar For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jayaprakash Govt Advocate https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9347 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 Order This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to correct the alleged errors in patta No.466 for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition. 2.According to the petitioner, he is the owner of the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition and has been issued with patta No.466. According to the petitioner, the extent of the property in patta No.466 has been wrongly mentioned. He seeks for correction of the same through his representation dated 20.12.2025. Since this said representation was not considered by the respondents, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. 3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra, is considered, on merits and in accordance with law by the competent authority namely, the third respondent, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a time frame to be fixed by this court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9347 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5.This court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the third respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 20.12.2025 seeking for rectification of patta No.466 for the property, morefully disclosed in the prayer to this writ petition, after giving due consideration to the supporting documents produced by the petitioner, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 17-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VGA To 1. The Collector O/o. Chennai Collectorate, Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, chennai 01 2. The Revenue Divisional officer O/o. RDO North chennai, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai 66 3. The Tahsildar O/o. Madhavaram Taluk office, Madhavaram Taluk, Chennai 66 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 9347 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. VGA WP No. 9347 of 2026 17-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis