PAPPU KUMAR YADAV @ PAPPU KU YADAV @ PAPPU YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./1561/2026 · 2026-04-13
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6171 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6171 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10545
--1-- A.B.A. No. 1561 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 1561 of 2026
---- Pappu Kumar Yadav @ Pappu Ku Yadav @ Pappu Yadav, aged about 36 years, son of Prakash Yadav @ Jai Prakash Yadav, resident of village – Banasari, PO and PS – Simaria, District – Chatra
.... Petitioner -- Versus --
The State of Jharkhand
.... Opposite Party
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate
For the State
:- Mr. Sudhir Kumar Mahto, Advocate
---- 02/13.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Simariya P.S. Case No.95 of 2025 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chatra.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that there is land dispute between the parties and for that altercation took place. He then submits that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the family members. He next submits that even the father of this petitioner, who is aged about 70 years,
2026:JHHC:10545
--2-- A.B.A. No. 1561 of 2026
have been implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.15 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of assault and injury has been received.
5. Looking into the contents of the FIR it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons. It has been pointed out that all the family members have been made accused and even the person, who is aged about 70 years, has been made accused and the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.15 of the petition and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 13.04.2026 Sangam/