Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 617 (RAJ)

DEEPAK NAGAR S/O SHRI MOHAN LAL NAGAR, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/366/2026 · 2026-03-10

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10334] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 366/2026 1. Deepak Nagar S/o Shri Mohan Lal Nagar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Dhodhsar, Tehsil Chomu, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) 2. Rekha Kanwar D/o Shri Dayalsingh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Villagecharanwala, Post Panwaliya, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor 2. Principal Secretary, Home Department, Jaipur, Rajasthan 3. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur 4. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, South, Jaipur, Metro, Jaipur. 5. Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural. 6. Sho, Police Station Muhana, Jaipur, South, Jaipur. 7. Sho, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur Rural 8. Dayal Singh S/o Shri Ugam Singh, R/o Village Charanwala, Post Panwaliya , Tehsil Sanganer , Jaipur 9. Chandra Kanwar W/o Shridayal Singh, R/o Village Charanwala, Post Panwaliya , Tehsil Sanganer , Jaipur 10. Jitendra Singh S/o Shri Dayal Singh, R/o Village Charanwala, Post Panwaliya , Tehsil Sanganer , Jaipur 11. Smt Sunita Kanwar W/o Shri Himmat Singh, R/o Madanganj Kishangarh, Ajmer. 12. Smt Seema Kanwar W/o Shri Rohit Singh, Malpura, Tonk. 13. Smt Mona Kanwar W/o Govind Singh, Village Sevapura, Aamer ,jaipur. 14. Mohan Lal Nagar S/o Shribhura Ram Nagar, R/o Village Dhodhsar, Tehsil, Chomu, District Jaipur. 15. Sushila Nagar W/o Shri Mohan Lal Nagar, R/o Village Dhodhsar, Tehsil, Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhishek Singh [2026:RJ-JP:10334] (2 of 3) [CRLW-366/2026] Mr. Ajay Poonia for Mr. Prem Chand Devanda For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.8 to 15 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj, Jhotwara, Jaipur on 27.12.2024 and same has been registered on 27.12.2024. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.8 to 15 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before [2026:RJ-JP:10334] (3 of 3) [CRLW-366/2026] respondent No.7-Station House Officer, Police Station Govindgarh, District Jaipur Rural and respondent no.7 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /212