Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2026 DAILYLAW 617 (JK)

UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) v. ADIL MAJEED WANI

LPA/101/2024 · 2026-02-10

Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S. No. 02 Regular Cause List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(1345/2026) IN LPA 101/2024 UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. ADIL MAJEED WANI ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Amjid Maqbool, Advocate for the applicant CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE ORDER 23.03.2026 This application is on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent who has stated that inadvertently while passing an order dated 10.02.2026, his appearance as a counsel for the respondent has not been recorded. We are in agreement with the averments made in the application. Name of Mr. Amjid Maqbool, Advocate, may be reflected as a counsel for the respondent in the order dated 10.02.2026. Modification be made in this regard. CM disposed of. (SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA) JUDGE JUDGE SRINAGAR 23.03.2026 “Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 24.03.2026 10:26