UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT) v. ADIL MAJEED WANI
LPA/101/2024 · 2026-02-10
Shahzad Azeem, Sindhu Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 617 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 617 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 02 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(1345/2026) IN LPA 101/2024
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs.
ADIL MAJEED WANI
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Amjid Maqbool, Advocate for the applicant
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 23.03.2026
This application is on behalf of the learned counsel for the respondent who has stated that inadvertently while passing an order dated 10.02.2026, his appearance as a counsel for the respondent has not been recorded. We are in agreement with the averments made in the application. Name of Mr. Amjid Maqbool, Advocate, may be reflected as a counsel for the respondent in the order dated 10.02.2026. Modification be made in this regard. CM disposed of.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM) (SINDHU SHARMA)
JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 23.03.2026
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 24.03.2026 10:26