Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 617 (JHR)

ASGAR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./10915/2025 · 2026-03-23

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:8054 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 10915 of 2025 Asgar Ansari, aged about 40 years, S/o Jabbar Ansari, R/o village-Tanda Basti, P.O. & P.S. Katras, District Dhanbad, Jharkhand … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opp. Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Sweta Singh, Advocate --- 04/23rd March 2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 39/2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 855/2025 and S.T. Case No. 287/2025 for the offence registered under Section 310(2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and charge has been framed under Section 310(2) and 317(3) of BNS, 2023, now said to have been pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Bokaro. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that although it is alleged that the petitioner has involvement in 17 cases, but as per his knowledge, he has been acquitted in 12 cases. 3. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer and has submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of the co- accused leading to recovery. 4. The status report reveals that as on 11.03.2026, all witnesses, except one, were already examined. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that the trial is at fag end, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, this bail application is rejected. 6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the court concerned through ‘e-mail/FAX’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: 23.03.2026 Uploaded On: 25.03.2026 Mukul/-