Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6166 (PAT)

Shashank Shekhar @ Bittu @ Sheshank Morya @ Sheshank Shekhar @ Shekhar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./18983/2026 · 2026-03-31

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18983 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-155 Year-2025 Thana- KARJAIN District- Supaul ====================================================== Shashank Shekhar @ Bittu @ Sheshank Morya @ Sheshank Shekhar @ Shekhar Son of Late Binod Mehta @ Late Binod Kumar Mehta Resident of Village- Bayasi, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Karjain, District- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 317(5) of BNS and Sections 25(1-B)(i) and 26 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that from the pocket of this petitioner, one mobile, from bag, four handsets of walkie talkie and charger and from fridge cover, four empty cartridges were recovered. 34 pieces of crackers, 320 pieces of pellets and a maruti car without registration number were also recovered. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that actually, only recovery from the possession of this petitioner is one mobile and the car which is said to recovered, belongs to the petitioner. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18983 of 2026(2) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 Others incriminating articles which were recovered, is from the joint house. There is no independent witness of the seizure list rather they are police personnel. Police has not complied Section 105 of BNSS while preparing the seizure list. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 27.12.2025 and charge sheet has been submitted. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of three cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Karjain P.S. Case No. 155 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Birpur (Supaul) shubham/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T