Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 61646 (MAD)

N. Abdul Jabbar v. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by the Superintendent of Police,

WP Crl.(MD)/4451/2026 · 2026-08-07

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4451 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 07.08.2026 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4451 of 2026 N.Abdul Jabbar ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District 3. The Inspector of Police, S.P.Pattinam Police Station, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4. H.Katchu Mohamed 5. K.Isyath Ali ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to direct the 3rd respondent to give adequate protection to the life and limb of the petitioner by considering his complaint dated 27.07.2026. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4451 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr.S.Atham Ali For Respondents : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy (R1 to R3) Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the 1st respondent to direct the 3rd respondent to give adequate protection to the life and limb of the petitioner by considering his complaint dated 27.07.2026. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent police submitted that the enquiry is pending. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either sides and carefully perused the materials available on record. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the private respondents, notice to them is dispensed with. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the third respondent police is directed to issue notices to both the petitioner and the private respondents under Section 64 of the BNSS, conduct an enquiry, and 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4451 of 2026 conclude the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. Upon conclusion of the enquiry, if it is found necessary that the petitioner be provided with adequate protection, the third respondent police shall afford appropriate police protection to the petitioner, subject to payment of the requisite charges, in accordance with G.O.Ms.No.139, Home (Pol-VIII) Department, dated 04.03.2019, within a period of two weeks therefrom. 6. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. 07.08.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No sm 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4451 of 2026 L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J. Sm TO:- 1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District 2. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police, O/o.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District 3. The Inspector of Police, S.P.Pattinam Police Station, Thiruvadanai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District. 4. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. Order made in W.P.Crl.(MD)No.4451 of 2026 Dated 07.08.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis