Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6161 (BOM)

POOJA ANIL SADASHIVE ALIAS POOJA RAVINDRA PANPATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER

APPLN/72/2026 · 2026-09-01

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 998criappln72.26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 998 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 72 OF 2026 POOJA ANIL SADASHIVE ALIAS POOJA RAVINDRA PANPATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shejwal Arun S. APP for Respondent No. 1/State : Mr. K.K.Naik ... CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. DATE : 01.09.2026 PER COURT : 1. The learned APP appearing for respondent-State submits that the applicant has availed the alternate remedy available in law to prefer the application for discharge before the learned trial Court, however, the application for discharge is still pending and the said fact has not been disclosed in the present petition. 2. The learned Advocate upon taking instructions confirms the fact that the discharge application is pending. He thus, on instructions, prays to allow the present application to be withdraw. 3. In view of the fact that the applicants have availed alternate statutory remedy available to them in law, the application cannot be adjudicated and stands dismissed as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) mahajansb/