SANTOSH KUMAR THAPA CHHETRY v. The State Of Jharkhand And Ors
WPC/6735/2016 · 2026-04-15
Sujit Narayan Prasad
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6160 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6160 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:10807
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
W.P(S) No. 6735 of 2016
---------------
Santosh Kumar Thapa Chhetry Son of Sri Man Bahadur Thapa Chhetry, Resident of J.A.P-I, Doranda, P.O-Doranda, P.S-Doranda, District- Ranchi ........Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Jharkhand
2. Director General-cum-I.G. of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi, having its office at Police House, Near Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O, P.S- Dhurwa, District-Ranchi
3. Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, Rani Kothi, PO, P.S-Doranda, District-Ranchi
4. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Jharkhand Armed Police, Rani Kothi, P.O, P.S-Doranda, District-Ranchi.
5. Commandant, Jharkhand Armed Police-I, P.O, P.S-Doranda, District- Ranchi ...... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
For the Petitioner : None For the Resp-State : Mr. Arun Kumar Dubey, AC to GP-III
Order No.08/Dated: 15th April, 2026
1. When the present writ petition was taken up for hearing before recess, none was present to represent the petitioner. Therefore, the case has been directed to be called upon after recess.
2. After recess, on repeated calls, no one appears to represent the petitioner.
3. Mr. Arun Kumar Dubey, the learned Associate Counsel to GP-III is present to represent the respondent-State.
4. This writ petition is of the year 2016.
5. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute the case.
6. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
7. Consequently, pending I.As, if any, stands disposed of.
(Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.)
Dated:15.04.2026 Sudhir