Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6159 (MAD)

G.RAVICHANDRAN v. The Managing Director

WP/8909/2026 · 2026-03-06

P T Asha

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 8909 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 5 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 8909 of 2026 G.Ravichandran S/o.M.Govindhasamy No.18/8, swathi Nagar chidambaram-608 001 ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Transport corporation (villupuram)ld No.3/137,Salamedu, Kandamanandi P.O., Villupuram District -605 401 2. The General Manager Tamilnadu state Transport corporation (villupuram )Ltd Cuddalore region No.2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore Cuddalore District -607 002 3. The Administrator Tamilnadu State transport corporation Employees Pension fund trust No.2, Pallavan salai, chennai-600 002 ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8909 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 5 Prayer: - Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of mandamus to consider the petitioner’s representations dated 14.2.2025 and to direct the respondents to pay interest of 12 percentage p.a for delay of 420 days till the date of order in releasing petitioner pension amount For Petitioner(s): M/s.M.Mullaipoovizhi For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Vinothraj, Standing Counsel for R.1 and R.2 ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "to consider the petitioners representations dated 14.2.2025 and to direct the respondents to pay interest of 12 percentage p.a for delay of 420 days till the date of order in releasing petitioner pension amount." 2. The case of the petitioner is that he had joined the services of the respondent Corporation as a Conductor and, after rendering 30 years of unblemished service, retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on 30.06.2018. The main grievance of the petitioner is that, though he had retired from service as early as 30.06.2018, his terminal benefits were settled belatedly only on 31.08.2019, contrary to the Pension Rules, and without https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8909 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 5 payment of any interest. Therefore, the petitioner had submitted a representation dated 14.02.2025, seeking interest for the belated settlement of the terminal benefits. However, the said representation has not been considered to date. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 4. Considering the limited relief sought for by the petitioner and taking note of the fact that the petitioner's representation dated 14.02.2025 has not been considered to date, the Writ Petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 14.02.2025, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 06-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No SHR https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8909 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 5 To 1. The Managing Director Tamilnadu State Transport corporation (villupuram)ld No.3/137,Salamedu, Kandamanandi P.O., Villupuram District -605 401 2. The General Manager Tamilnadu state Transport corporation (villupuram )Ltd Cuddalore region No.2, Imperial Road, Cuddalore Cuddalore District -607 002 3. The Administrator Tamilnadu State transport corporation Employees Pension fund trust No.2, Pallavan salai, chennai-600 002 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 8909 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 5 P.T.ASHA J. SHR WP No. 8909 of 2026 06-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis