[2026:RJ-JP:16217] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3033/2026 Chetram S/o Jallaram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Sanet Ka Pura, Police Station Shrimahaveer Ji, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lakhan Singh Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 17/04/2026 1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.138/2025 registered at Police Station-Mahaveerji, District-Karauli for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 109(2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 3 and 25 of Arms Act, 2019, the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The present matter arises from an FIR lodged by the complainant Ratiram alleging that the petitioner along with other co-accused armed with deadly weapons inflicted injuries to injured Sumer, Motilal and Sunita. It is [2026:RJ-JP:16217] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3033/2026] submitted that in the present case, a cross-FIR has also been registered. Both the parties are residents of the same locality. The parties have now amicably resolved their dispute and have arrived at a compromise. Consequently, they do not wish to pursue the criminal proceedings initiated against each other. In support of his contentions, he has produced the compromise arrived at between the parties. No custodial interrogation is required. Hence, the anticipatory bail of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for the complainant acceded to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and raises no objection to the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner being allowed. 6. Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that compromise has arrived at between the parties but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner-Chetram S/o Jallaram, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; [2026:RJ-JP:16217] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3033/2026] (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/53