Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6153 (GAU)

ON THE DEATH OF SHRI RAJEN GOSWAMI , v. SRI KANAK CH. DEKA AND ORS

I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025 · 2026-05-07

Kaushik Goswami

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010204742025 2026:GAU-AS:6357 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/3072/2025 ON THE DEATH OF SHRI RAJEN GOSWAMI HIS LEGAL HEIRS 1.1: SMTI TARUNI GOSWAMI W/O LATE RAJEN GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA PO DEOMORNOI MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 784147 ASSAM 1.2: SMTI ANANDITA GOSWAMI D/O LATE RAJEN GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KATAHI PO SANTIPUKHURI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 1.3: SMTI PIKUMANI GOSWAMI D.O LATE RAJEN GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF BHEBARGHAT NO. 2 BAMUNPARA MANGALDAI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 784125 ASSAM 2: SRI PARESH GOSWAMI S/O LATE MANIK GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI Page No.# 2/4 DIST DARRANG ASSAM 3: SMTI BHARATI GOSWAMI D/O LATE MANIK GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 4: SRI MAHENDRA GOSWAMI S/O LATE MANIK GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 5: SHRI BUDHU GOSWAMI S/O NARAYAN GOSWAMI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG ASSAM VERSUS SRI KANAK CH. DEKA AND ORS S/O LATE GANA KOCH AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 2:SRI RANJIT DEKA S/O LATE GANA KOCH AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG ASSAM 3:SRI DANDA DEKA S/O LATE GANA KOCH AND RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KHARKHOWAPARA MOUZA SARABARI PS MANGALDOI DIST DARRANG Page No.# 3/4 ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. S P ROY Advocate for : appearing for SRI KANAK CH. DEKA AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 08.05.2026 Heard Mr. J. Das, learned counsel for the applicant.Also heard Mr. D. Mazumdar, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. The present interlocutory application has been filed under Order XXII Rule 9(2) of the CPC read with Order XXI Rule 3 of the CPC for setting aside the abatement against the deceased Appellant No.1. It appears from the materials on record that during the pendency of the connectedRSA No.217/2011, the appellant No.1, RajenGoswami, expired on 30.10.2021, leaving behind the following legal heirs: 1(i).Smti.Taruni Goswami. 1(ii).Smti.Anandita Goswami. 1(iii).Smti.Pikumani Goswami. I have considered the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and have also perused the materials available on record. Page No.# 4/4 From the explanation furnished in the application, this Court is this Court is satisfied that the delay in bringing the legal heirs of the deceased appellant on record does not appear to be deliberate or mala fide. Learned counsel for the respondents has also fairly submitted that he has no objection to the prayer made in the application. In the circumstances, and upon being satisfied that sufficient cause has been shown, the abatement that occurred on account of the death of the appellant No1 in RSA No.217/2011 is hereby set aside. The applicant shall take necessary steps for substitution of the legal heirs of the deceased appellant in accordance with law. With the above directions, the interlocutory application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant