Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6151 (PNJ)

MUKESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRWP/5315/2026 · 2026-05-07

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-5315-2026 IN THE HIGH CO (111 ) MUKESH KUMAR STATE OF PUNJA CORAM: HON'B Present: Mr. Him Ms. Ruc ****  MANISHA BATRA 1. The pre Constitution of India respondents No.1 to of respondent No.2 (Annexure P-1). 2. At the v that the petitioners h Senior Superintende grievances as menti considered and no ac stage, the petitioner respondent No.2-Sen aforesaid representat 2026 (O&M) (1) H COURT OF PUNJAB AND HAR MAR AND ANOTHER Versus UNJAB AND OTHERS ON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISH Himanshu Bansal, Advocate for the s. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior DAG, P  ATRA, J. (ORAL) he present petition has been filed f India seeking issuance of a writ of m 1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty No.2 and to take action on their rep t the very outset, learned counsel for ners have recently filed a representa ntendent of Police, District Faridkot mentioned in the present petition bu no action has been taken thereon. He itioners would be satisfied if approp Senior Superintendent of Police, sentation filed by the petitioners and ta HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-5315-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 07.05.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents NISHA BATRA  for the petitioners AG, Punjab filed under Article 226 of the it of mandamus directing the official iberty of the petitioners at the hands eir representation dated 02.05.2026 sel for the petitioners has submitted esentation on 02.05.2026 before the ridkot (Annexure P-1) raising their ion but the same has not yet been on. He further submitted that at this appropriate directions are issued to lice, District Faridkot to decide the s and take necessary action thereon. ners the ficial ands 2026 itted e their been t this d to e the AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.07 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5315-2026 3. Notice o 4. Ms. Ru behalf of the respon course. Let a comple the day. 5. In view commenting anythin at this stage with representation dated of 15 days from to Needless to say, if a would provide them  07.05.2026 Amit Sharma 2026 (O&M) (1) otice of motion. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. DAG, P respondents-State and submits that th omplete set of the paperbook be suppl view of the limited prayer made nything on the merits of the case, the with a direction to respondent N dated 02.05.2026 (Annexure P-1) of om today, by passing a speaking or y, if any threat is found to the petitio them adequate security in order to pro (MANI Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No    AG, Punjab, has advance notice on hat the needful will be done in due supplied to her during the course of made by the petitioners, without e, the present petition is disposed of ent No.2 to decide the aforesaid 1) of the petitioners within a period ing order in accordance with law. petitioners, the official respondents to protect their life and liberty. ANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  es/No  e on due se of thout ed of esaid eriod law. dents AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.07 15:42 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.