[2026:RJ-JP:13860] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1910/2026 Kapil Kumar Meena S/o Shri Hariram Meena @ Haresh, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Bairawada, Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.). (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Sub Jail Rajgarh, District Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma, Ms. Khyati Joshi, Mr. Aamir Khan, Ms. Chanchal, Mr. Utkarsh Goyal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP, Mr. Kailash Jindal, Dy. S.P., C.O. Laxmangarh, Alwar. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 214/2025 registered at Police Station Raini, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(3), 352 and 303(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that initially FIR was registered under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(3), 352 and 303(2) of BNS. After investigation, the police have charge-sheeted the petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:13860] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1910/2026] along with the other co-accused under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 127(2), 140(3), 324(4), 111(2)(b) and 310(2) of BNS. It is also contended that the other co-accused Abhay @ Ramotar have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 03.12.2025 and the case of the petitioner is not distinguishable from the other co-accused, apart from the fact that two other criminal cases were registered against the petitioner. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2025 and charge- sheet has already been submitted and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner along with the other co-accused committed rape and also caused injuries to the complainant and three mobile phones were recovered from the petitioner's possession. The accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and two other offences of similar nature were also registered against him, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 16.12.2025 and charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Kapil Kumar Meena S/o Shri Hariram Meena @ Haresh, in connection with [2026:RJ-JP:13860] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1910/2026] FIR No. 214/2025 registered at Police Station Raini, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. The accused-petitioner is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 8. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/47