Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 61459 (MAD)

Manimaran v. The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/21791/2026 · 2026-08-20

N Ramesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 Manimaran ..Petitioner Vs The State Rep. by, The Inspector of Police PEW-Coimbatore City Police Station, Coimbatore District. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the Petitioner on bail in Cr.No.122 of 2026 pending on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner: Mr.K.A.M.Jagadish Kumar For Respondent: Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.06.2026 for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c) 20(b)(ii)(b), 25 and 29(1) of NDPS Act in Crime No.122 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found to be in possession of 4.2 kg of ganja. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and that he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that while he was in arrest, his wife has given birth to his child on 18.07.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the Petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has been arrayed as A1 and the recovery from the petitioner is 2.1 kg of ganja. He further submitted that the petitioner has two previous case of which one is similar in nature. He further submitted that charge sheet is yet to be filed. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the Petitioner. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the totality of the circumstances and considering the fact that his wife has delivered a child on 18.07.2026 and that the charge sheet is yet to be filed and considering the intermediate quantity of contraband, this Court is of the view that further incarceration of the petitioner is not required. Hence, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, subject to certain conditions. 7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned VI JM At Coimbatore, and on further conditions that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 [e] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 20-08-2026 SHL Note: 1. Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To: 1. The VI JM At Coimbatore. 2. The Central Prison Coimbatore. 3. The Inspector of police PEW- Coimbatore City police Station. Coimbatore District. 4. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 N.RAMESH J. SHL CRL OP No. 21791 of 2026 20-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis