Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6144 (RAJ)

M/S GOYAL MINERAL PVT LTD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/5310/2026 · 2026-03-24

Ganesh Ram Meena

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:12339] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5310/2026 1. M/s Goyal Mineral Pvt Ltd, Through Proprietor Mahendra Kumar Goyal S/o Shri Net Ram Goyal, Aged About 56 Years, R/o H-79 To 82, Riico Industrial Area, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar, (Rajasthan.) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj23Gc1070. Rj23Gc1071 And Rj23Gb6400. 2. Ganpati Industries, Through Proprietor Daulat Ram Goyal S/o Shri Netram Goyal,r/o H-84-85, Industrial Area, Neem Ka Thana, Sikar,(Rajasthan.) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj23Gc4560. 3. Arman Group Company, Through Proprietor Niyaz Mohammed S/o Shri Fazruddin, R/o Behram Patti, Dhoj (17), Faridabad, (Haryana.) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr38Ab9939. 4. Jai Singh S/o Shri Ram Niwas, R/o Tehla (214),mahendragarh, (Haryana.) Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj14Gq5463. 5. Sokeen S/o Shri Magru, R/o Vpo Kadarpur, Tehsil Badshahpur, District Gurugram, (Haryana.)Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr55Al8701 And Hr55Al8396. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kotputli-Behror, Rajasthan. 5. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar, District Sikar, Rajasthan. 6. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan 7. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. [2026:RJ-JP:12339] (2 of 4) [CW-5310/2026] 8. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur Second, District Jaipur, rajasthan. 9. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Alwar, District Alwar, Rajasthan. 10. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 11. Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Ajmer, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 12. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Beawar, District Beawar, Rajasthan. 13. District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kekari, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. 14. District Transport Officer, Dto Office, Jagatpura, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG with Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 24/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State agrees and submits that the present writ may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra). 3. Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court are as follows :- [2026:RJ-JP:12339] (3 of 4) [CW-5310/2026] “6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days. 7. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 8. It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado. 9. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order. 10. In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.” 4. Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:- [2026:RJ-JP:12339] (4 of 4) [CW-5310/2026] (i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioners are suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners alongwith their counsel concerned shall report to/before the notice issuing authority on 07.04.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and submit the explanation. (ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 5. Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /35