K.Senthil Vinayagam v. State By, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/18718/2026 · 2026-08-06
D Bharatha Chakravarthy
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 61414 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 61414 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 18718 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 06-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY CRL OP No. 18718 of 2026 and CRL.MP.Nos.12466 and 12467 of 2026 K.Senthil Vinayagam ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. State By, The Inspector of Police W29-Meenambakkam All Women Police Station, Chennai-600 027, Crime No.2 of 2026
2. Mrs. L. Sharon Babi ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS, praying to call for the entire records concerned in Charge Sheet in C.C.No.734 of 2026 on the file of the Honorable Court of Additional Mahila (Judicial Magistrate Level), Alandur, Chennai and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Muththusaran Sundaresh For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Rajasekaran, Government Advocate (Crl. Side), For R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18718 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 ORDER The parties are present before this Court. 2. The de facto complainant is present before this Court and submitted that it is not a case where she has compromised with the accused or that she has in terms of settlement with the accused. On the other hand, she would submit that she is willing to forget the episode if an apology in writing is presented before the Court. The said submissions are taken on record. 3. She also appeared in person and placed on record a memo to that effect and the same is also taken on record. 4. In open Court, the petitioner/accused is present and the learned counsel would submit that they will file such an affidavit for apology during the course of the day. 5. Recording the same, and considering the entire issue, I am of the view that the fact of this case will come within the contour of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Gian Singh -Vs- State of Punjab and Another (2012 10 SCC 303) and accordingly, the matter stands quashed subject to the petitioner filing an affidavit before this Court. Accordingly, this Criminal https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18718 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 Original Petition is allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. 06-08-2026 Neutral Citation: No PVS To
1. The Additional Mahila Court (Judicial Magistrate Level), Alandur, Chennai
2. Inspector of Police W29-Meenambakkam All Women Police Station, Chennai-600 027, Crime No.2 of 2026
3.
The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 18718 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J. PVS CRL OP No. 18718 of 2026 06-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis