Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010093742026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/523/2026 MOHAR ALI S/O/ LT. SURAB ALI, VILL.- BADULIPARA, P/S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR, DIST.
LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.
REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM.
2:MD. NAIB ALI S/O. PALTU MIA VILL.- BADULIPARA P/O. RONGPURI P/S. NORTH LAKHIMPUR DIST. LAKHIMPUR ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A NATH, DR ANKIT TODI,MS. R JUGLI,MS M PARBIN,PRIYANKA DAS,MS. T P THANCHUNG Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 MOHAR ALIASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAMASSAM ------------ Advocate for : ANKUMANI NATH Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 20.05.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. A. Nath, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 166 days in filing the appeal against conviction of the applicant-appellant under Section 4 of the POCSO Act read with Section 448 IPC.
2. Mr. R.R. Kaushik, learned Addl. P.P submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned.
3. Accordingly, the delay of 166 days is condoned.
4. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same.
5. The I.A. is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant