SURENDRA CHANDRA BARMAN AND ANR v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS
WP(C)/2178/2026 · 2026-05-12
Soumitra Saikia
Civil Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6135 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6135 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010076842026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2178/2026 SURENDRA CHANDRA BARMAN AND ANR R/O- BASHBARI NO. 7,P.O. - KIRTANPARA,P.S. - MANIKPUR,DIST. - BONGAIGAON, ASSAM,PIN CODE - 783384 2: SMT JAMUNA BALA BARMAN W/O- SURENDRA CHANDRA BARMAN R/O- BASHBARI NO. 7 P.O. - KIRTANPARA P.S. - MANIKPUR DIST. - BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE -78338 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 6 ORS THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER, NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, MALIGAON,GUWAHATI, ASSAM, PIN CODE- 781011.
2:THE FINANCIAL ADVISER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER (F.A. AND C.A.O.) NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON ASSAM PIN CODE -781011.
3:THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER (P) ALIPURDUAR JUNCTION DIVISION NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY P.O. AND DIST.-ALIPURDUAR-736123.
4:THE DIVISIONAL FINANCE MANAGER ALIPURDUAR JUNCTION DIVISION NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
Page No.# 2/3 ALIPURDUAR PS AND DIST. -ALIPURDUAR - 736123.
5:THE DIVISIONAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER ALIPURDUAR JN. N.F. RAILWAY WEST BENGAL-781011.
6:DIPANJALI ROY C/O - LATE CHANDRA SHEKHAR ROY R/O- BISAINDAI PART II P.O.
P.S. AND DIST.-DHUBRI ASSAM PIN CODE -783301.
7:SAMIR BARMAN S/O- BISWAJAEET BARMAN REPRESENTED BY HIS MOTHER DIPANJALY ROY AGED ABOUT31 YEARS C/O - LATE CHANDRA SHEKHAR ROY R/O- BISAINDAI PART II P.O.
P.S. AND DIST. DHUBRI ASSAM PIN CODE -783301 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M U MAHMUD, C YANTHAN,S SEKH,V KHAKHALARY,MR S H MAHMUD Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I.,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 13.05
.2026 Mr. M.U. Mahmud, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has been settled between the parties amicably outside the Court therefore, the writ petitioner does not wish to press the writ petition any further.
Page No.# 3/3
2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.
3. Interim order, if any stands vacated.
4. Pending interlocutory application, if any is also dismissed.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant