Samu @ Samuvel v. The State Rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/23177/2026 · 2026-08-19
N Ramesh
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 61337 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 61337 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 23177 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL OP No. 23177 of 2026 Samu @ Samuvel S/o.Ashok, No.15/6, Egangipuram 2nd Street, Ayanavaram, Chennai-600023. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police P-2, Otteri Police Station, Chennai District. Crime No.282 of 2026. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.282 of 2026 on the file of respondent police. For Petitioner(s): M/s. S.Esakkimuthu For Respondent(s): Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 29.07.2026 for the alleged offence under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 115(2), 311 and 351(3) of BNS and Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, in Crime No.282 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23177 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
2. The allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner waylaid the de facto complainant and demanded money from him. It is alleged that, due the said allege threat, the defacto complainant handed over a sum of Rs.600/-, to the accused persons. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been in judicial custody since 29.07.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner is innocent and no way connected with the offence and that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has 8 previous cases pending against him. Hence, he strongly oppose for the grant of bail to the petitioner.
5. I have given my anxious consideration to the submissions made by the
learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the nature of the allegations and the previous criminal antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is of the firm view that at this stage, if the petitioner is released on bail, he would abscond and may not appear before https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23177 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the Court by abiding the condition and would indulge in similar offences. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 19-08-2026 DRL To 1.The Inspector of Police P-2, Otteri Police Station, Chennai District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 23177 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 N.RAMESH, J. DRL CRL OP No. 23177 of 2026 19-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis