Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP No. 31988 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY WP No. 31988 of 2026 A.Rajendran ..Petitioner(s) Vs
1. The Tahsildar, Kalvarayan Hills and Taluk, Kallakurichi District.
2. Raman
3. Krishnan
4. Mathiyalagan
5. Lakshmanan ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st Respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioner’s representation dated 22.06.2026 with regard to cancellation of patta stands in the name of the Respondents 2 to 5 in respect of the petitioner’s property to an extent of 1 acre in Survey No.110/3 (Now subdivided as 110/3B7, 110/3B5, 110/3B6 and 110/3B4) situated at Mavadipattu Village, Kalvarayan Hills Taluk, Kallakurichi District. For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Balamanikandan For Respondent(s): Ms.A.Bakkiya Lakshmi, Additional Government Pleader for R1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31988 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
ORDER This writ petition is filed to consider the petitioner's representation dated
22.06.2026.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has made a representations dated 22.06.2026 before the first respondent, seeking cancellation of patta stands in the name of the Respondents 2 to 5 in respect of the petitioner’s property to an extent of 1 acre in Survey No.110/3 (Now subdivided as 110/3B7, 110/3B5, 110/3B6 and 110/3B4) situated at Mavadipattu Village, Kalvarayan Hills Taluk, Kallakurichi District. However, the said representation was not considered, as on date. Hence, this writ petition.
3. Ms.A.Bakkiya Lakshmi, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of first respondent and submitted that the power to cancel a patta is vested with the Revenue Divisional Officer (RDO). However, in the case on hand, the petitioner has sent a representation to the Tahsildar/first respondent, who lacks the competent authority to order such a cancellation.
4. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31988 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4
5. Since the cancellation power is vested with the Revenue Divisional Officer, this Court directs the petitioner to make a fresh representation seeking the cancellation of the patta before the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. On receipt of such representation, the concerned Revenue Divisional Officer is
directed to dispose of the same, after issuing due notice to the petitioner as well as the respondents 2 to 5 and other aggrieved parties, if any, within a period of eight (8) weeks thereof. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition stands
disposed of. No costs. 13-08-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VM To: The Tahsildar, Kalvarayan Hills and Taluk, Kallakurichi District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
WP No. 31988 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J. VM WP No. 31988 of 2026 13-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis