1 APHC010574842013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3603] MONDAY, THE 13th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 157/2013 Between: 1. PILLI SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, E.G.DIST, S/O.SRI PUTRAYYA OCC: BUSINESS R/O.D.NO. 2-181 MADHAVAPATNAM SAMALKOT MANDAL, EG DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. GUTHURTHI VENKATA VIJAYENDRA RAO E G DIST 2 OTHRS, S/O. LATE SRI VENKATA RAO R/O.D.NO. 13-2- 64 PITHAPURAM - 533 450 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 2. GUTHURI SUBRAHMANYESWARA SWAMY, S/O. LATE SRI VENKATA RAO R/O.D.NO. 13-2-64 PITHAPURAM - 533 450 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT 3. DONTHULLA SATYAVANI, W/O. SRI RAMA RAO R/O. GOLLAPROLU - 533 445 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 234 OF 2013 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 234 days in representing CMA Sr No. 21610/2011 and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2013(CMAMP 314 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the decree and order made in IA.No. 2133 of 2011 in OS.No. 127 of 2011 on the file of the court of the IV Additional District Judge, East Godavari, Kakinada dt. 16/02/2012, pending disposal of the present CMA Counsel for the Appellant: 1. N SIVA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JOSYULA BHASKARA RAO 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 157 of 2013 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice D.Ramesh) 1. The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is filed assailing the order dated 16.02.2012 passed in I.A.No.2133 of 2011 in O.S.No.127 of 2011 by the learned IV Additional District Judge, East Godavari District at Kakinada, whereby the Court below granted an order of temporary injunction in favour of the respondent/plaintiff. 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that, on verification of the e-Courts portal, it is noticed that the suit in O.S.No.127 of 2011 has already been disposed of. 4. Having regard to the said submission, this Court finds that the present appeal arises out of an interlocutory order granting temporary injunction pending disposal of the suit. Since the main 4 suit itself has already been disposed of, no effective relief survives for consideration in the present appeal. 5. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH _________________________________ JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR Date: 13.07.2026 klk 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ALAPATI GIRIDHAR 156 C.M.A.No.157 of 2013 Dated: 13.07.2026 klk