SRI SAI SIKSHAN SANSTHAN v. KUMAON UNIVERSITY NAINITAL
WPMS/1163/2026 · 2026-05-26
Pankaj Purohit
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6131 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6131 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:4171
SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS No.1163 of 2026 Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Chandra Shekhar Joshi, learned Counsel for petitioner.
2. Mr. Devendra Pant, learned S.C. for the State.
3. Mr. Rajiv Singh Bisht and Mr. Naveen Chandra Paneru, learned Counsel for respondent no.1.
4. Learned Counsel for petitioner made a statement at bar that the present writ petition has rendered infructuous due to subsequent developments and the same may be dismissed as such.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.)
26.05.2026 R.Dang