Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 61301 (MAD)

Dhanalakshmi v. State rep by The Inspector of Police,

CRL OP/21394/2026 · 2026-08-19

N Ramesh

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 21394 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 19-08-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.RAMESH CRL OP No. 21394 of 2026 Dhanalakshmi ..Petitioner Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police, PEW Guduvancherry Unit. ..Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to direct enlargement of the Petitioner/Accused on bail in Crime No.103 of 2026 on the file of the Respondent. For Petitioner: No appearance For Respondent: Mr.M.M.I.Khaleel Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 12.06.2026 for the alleged offence under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Ac in Crime No.103 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner was found to be in https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21394 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 possession of 8 kgs of ganja. Hence, the case. 3. There is no representation for the petitioner. 4. Per contra, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the Respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has been incarcerated since 12.06.2026. He further submitted that the petitioner has three previous cases including one case under NDPS Act and one case under 302 IPC and one robbery case. Hence, he opposed the grant of bail to the petitioner. 5. Heard the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case; taking note of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side); considering the totality of the circumstances and upon the fact that the petitioner has three previous cases pending against him including one case under NDPS Act, one robbery case and one case under 302 IPC, this Court is of the view that it is not appropriate to consider the bail application of the petitioner. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21394 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 19-08-2026 SHL To: 1. The Inspector of Police, PEW Guduvancherry Unit. 2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 21394 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 N.RAMESH, J. SHL CRL OP No. 21394 of 2026 19-08-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis