Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6130 (GAU)

MANGAL SINGHA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

I.A.(Crl.)/490/2026 · 2026-05-12

Michael Zothankhuma, Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010072422026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/490/2026 MANGAL SINGHA S/O. LT. MOHAN SINGHA, R/O. VILL.- NADIAPUR WARD NO. 3, P/O. KALACHARA, P/S. LALCHERA, DIST. DHARMA NAGAR, TRIPURA, 799250 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SRI MIHIR DAS S/O. LT. MUNINDRA DAS R/O. BONGAON NEAR INCOME TAX OFFICE H.NO. 31 P/S. BASISTHA DIST. KAMRUP (M) 781028 ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. M K BROWN, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 MANGAL SINGHAASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Page No.# 2/2 Advocate for : MANISHA KAREN BROWN Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 13.05.2026 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Ms. M. K. Brown, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that there is a delay of 945 days in filing the appeal against the conviction of the applicant under Section 6 of the POCSO Act. Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Addl. PP, Assam submits that he has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the grounds of delay and keeping in view the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay of 945 days is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same accordingly. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed of. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant