Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6130 (CHH)

SMT. NEELAM SHUKLA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2813/2026 · 2026-04-07

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 3 2026:CGHC:16099 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2813 of 2026 Smt. Neelam Shukla W/o Late Shri Kishore Shukla Aged About 52 Years R/o Matachoura Chowk, Street No. 02, Kududand, P.S.- Civil Line, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District - Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Its Secretary, Dept. Of Health And Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. And Post- Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner-Cum-Director Directorate Health Services, North Block, Sector-19, P.S. And Post- Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Collector Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Chief Medical And Health Officer (Cmho) Office Of Chief Medical And Health Officer, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - Block Medical Officer (Bmo) Office Of Bmo, Community Health Centre, Masturi, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.04.13 17:22:44 +0530 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Mr. Rishabhdev Sahu, Advocate For State : Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 08/04/2026 1. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, this case is heard finally. 2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:- “10.1. This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or direction to the respondent no. 01, 02, 03 & 04 to decide the representation of petitioner for release of retiral dues of deceased husband of the petitioner i.e. family pension, gratuity, Amount of GPS, GIS, Leave encashment, arrears and other benefits in accordance with law within the period of 60 days. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to make any other order that may be deemed fit and just in the facts and circumstances.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this stage petitioner is not pressing this writ petition on merit and only seeking a direction to respondent No.4 to consider and take decision on pending representation Annexure P-7 dated 01.01.2026 at the earliest within specified time frame 4. Learned counsel for the State submit that she is having no objection to the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3 / 3 5. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition at this stage is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider and take decision on representation submitted by petitioner in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen