1 2026:CGHC:6984 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1527 of 2026 1 - Onkar S/o Ramchandra Sapha, Aged About 62 Years The Retired Work Charged Employee, R/o H.No. 177, Ward No. 09, Village Jeora, Post Sirsa, Tehsil Durg, District Durg C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadii Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadii Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadii Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadii Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 5 - The Executive Engineer, Public Works Department, Division No. 01 Durg, District Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) ABHIGYA SAXENA Digitally signed by ABHIGYA SAXENA 2 For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anand Kumar Kujur, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, Panel Lawyer S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 09/02/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner who stood retired as Work Charged and Contingency Paid Employees is entitled for leave encashment but till date respondents have not extended the benefit of leave encashment to petitioner. Identical issue came up for hearing before this Court in case of Faguvaram Patel & Ors. Vs. State of C.G., in W.P.(S) No. 3870 of 2021 decided on 30.09.2022, wherein petitioners have raised identical issue which was allowed in their favour. He submits that at this stage, petitioner may be permitted to submit representation in light of Faguvaram Patel (supra) and respondents be directed to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner expeditiously within specified time. 2. Learned State counsel submits that as petitioner is not pressing this petition on merits and is only seeking a direction to decide the representation to be submitted by petitioner, at this stage, he is having no objection. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of permitting the 3 petitioner to make fresh representation. In the event, petitioner submit representation, it shall be considered and decided in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of representation keeping in mind decision in case of Faguvaram Patel (supra). 5. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Saxena